Traditional risk assessments for sexual offending among people with intellectual disabilities (ID) have relied on clinical, deficit-focused models like the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) framework. While effective for tracking static risks, these approaches often overlook individual human rights, personal aspirations, and the social contexts driving harmful sexual behavior (HSB).​ This paper advances a Person-Centered Planning (PCP) approach, integrating the Dignity of Risk, Good Lives Model (GLM), and public safety imperatives into forensic ID services. PCP empowers individuals by shifting risk formulation from clinical typologies to collaborative functional behavior analysis. Involving the person, family, and Circle of Support, it identifies unmet needs such as sexual education deficits, social isolation, or sensory processing issues that underlie HSB.​ Methodological challenges like communication barriers and ID-specific cognitive profiles are addressed by adapting tools like ARMIDILO-S with person-centered data from support circles. Resulting risk management plans prioritize proactive strategies such as skill-building, community inclusion over purely restrictive measures.​ Implementation data reveal superior outcomes: traditional restrictive plans yield stagnant incidents (8/month), while PCP frameworks achieve a 66% behavior reduction by month eight and eliminate crisis alerts by twelve months, balancing autonomy with community safety.​ Ultimately, PCP offers a sustainable, ethical alternative, reducing recidivism by promoting quality of life without compromising rights. Quality-of-life enhancement is not a trade-off for safety but its key enabler.​