Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour

Peer Review Process

The Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and objectivity of published articles. The process is designed to provide constructive feedback to authors while upholding the highest academic standards.

  1. Initial Submission: All manuscripts are initially assessed by the editorial team to ensure they align with the journal's scope and adhere to submission guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet the requirements may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected outright.

  2. Double-Blind Review: Submissions deemed suitable for consideration undergo a double-blind peer review process. In this process, the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are anonymized to ensure impartiality and fairness.

  3. Reviewer Selection: Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject area. The editorial team ensures that reviewers have no conflicts of interest and are well-qualified to evaluate the manuscript.

  4. Evaluation Criteria: Reviewers assess manuscripts based on originality, methodological rigor, clarity, relevance, and significance of findings. They provide detailed, constructive feedback to guide authors in improving their work.

  5. Editorial Decision: Based on reviewer comments, the editorial team makes one of the following decisions:

    • Acceptance: The manuscript is accepted for publication with minor or no revisions.

    • Revisions Required: Authors are invited to revise their manuscript in response to reviewer feedback.

    • Rejection: The manuscript does not meet the journal's standards for publication.

  6. Revisions and Resubmission: Authors are given a specific timeframe to revise their manuscript. Resubmissions are reviewed by the editorial team, and in some cases, additional reviewer input may be sought.

  7. Final Decision: The editorial team makes the final decision regarding publication, taking into account the reviewers' recommendations and the quality of revisions.

  8. Publication: Once accepted, the manuscript undergoes copyediting, typesetting, and proofreading before being published online.

The peer review process is designed to ensure that all published work meets the highest standards of academic excellence while fostering a constructive and supportive environment for authors to improve their contributions.